| |
Luke
10.25-28, Deut. 6.5, Lev. 9.18.
I
have never been very good at taking tests. I recently tried to upgrade to
Amateur Extra. I have taken the test two times and missed passing by four
questions the last time. In 1969 I stood before the examining committee of the
SE Synod of the LCA.
“Mr.
Fege, how do you reconcile the Decalogue with the Gospel” John Brockoff a
Lutheran Prof. at
Again,
it helps to read what is happening, only a few verses before the Gospel for
today, where Jesus tells his disciples “God
has hidden these things from the wise and intelligent and revealed them to
infants” vs. 23.
Just
then a lawyer stood up to test Jesus. The lawyer was the opposite of “infants”,
to put this exchange into an even wider context…
Jesus
was on the road to
The
Lawyer was not just any lawyer but an expert on Jewish Religious Law…
And
like the examining committee I faced in Callaway Gardens 41 years ago, it was
his job to make sure that this wandering self-proclaimed Rabbi was kosher.
So
he asked “The Question”, “What must I do
to inherit eternal life?”
Jesus
was not put on the spot. He answered “The Question” with another question, quoting
Deut. 6.5 and Lev. 9.18 gave Jesus the equivalent of our Apostle’s Creed… The
Shema.
That
you love the Lord with all your passion, and prayer, and muscle, and
intelligence and that you love your neighbor as well as yourself. (Eugene
Peterson’s translation)
Jesus
congratulates the man. For all practical purposes it could have all ended
there.
If
you want to live forever do what your Bible says…
Having
served as a pastor in the Bible belt, I know that things concerning the Bible
never end right there. Did you notice how Jesus has the Bible thumper answer
his own question?
Now
it was a draw. Jesus one, Lawyer one…
But
having the right answer and living it is not the same thing… are they?
Elie
Wiesel, the Jewish survivor of
So
the Lawyer asked another question. The Greek word translated “Justify” in the
NRSV is a legal term and would have been understood that way…
In
other words in legal matters one defines one's usage of words…
So
Jesus moves from the catechetical to the metaphorical way of debate and tells
the first parable, found only in Luke’s Gospel… and what a parable it is.
Here
it is helpful to again review the plot and characters in this lesson.
Characters:
Jesus,
Bible Scholar… the story set on a road between
The victim’s identity is not known… but
he was probably Jewish – as a matter of fact each is known only by their
vocation or their ethnicity…
A
Samaritan traveling on Israelite territory
A
Priest, a Levite and a man from
The
Lawyer, the Priest, and Levite – all good respectable religious folk who knew
their Bible…
The
Samaritan – not good, not religious, not respectable, not known for his
biblical acumen…
Samaritans
came into being, when Jews returning from Exile got back, they found that many
of those who where not deported had intermarried and had set up worship at a
mountain far away from the temple in Jerusalem.
They
also interpreted the Bible differently… so they were heretics…the least likely
to help anyone…
He
was a non-religious, no good, questionable character known only by his ethnicity…
Talk about profiling.
He
spent two days' wages, risked his life by stopping to help… and promised to pay
the innkeeper whatever else might be due… when he came that way again.
The
story ends…
Jesus
does not define neighbor, he only asks which of those who came down the road
was the neighbor?
It
all began with a theological question “what
must I do to inherit eternal life?
The
questioner answered with a quote which came right out of his Bible – the word
translated love is agape; it is – a verb not a noun.
Verbs
are action words and don’t do well standing alone…
In
the light of today’s world, who are the Samaritans?
Who
are the Bible thumpers?
Who
are those who pass by on the other side?
Who
do you identify with in the story?
Ready for a test?